A PEOPLE OF VISION.      Stuart Bell

There’s a building contractor working out of a tiny hamlet called Olmarch near Tregaron and on the side of his van it says, ‘London, Paris, New York, Olmarch’.  There’s a man with vision.  It is so typical of politicians, businessmen, lobby groups, and so untypical of the Christians church.

Helen Keller once said, “What could be worse than being born without sight?  Being born with sight and no vision”.  Where is the vision of the churches in Wales?  Where is their vision for themselves, and where is their vision for Wales?  To have no expectations of progress, improvement, going places leaves a church just doing laps.  Christmas is over, Lent comes and goes, then its Easter, after that comes Whitsun, then the summer, then it’ll be Harvest, Remembrance Sunday and we’re back to Christmas once again.  We’ve done another lap.  Is that all there is to our Christian life?

A statement which has shaken me and really made me think seriously in recent years is this, that the future is not a done deal.  There are many individuals and organisations and commercial enterprises who are already planning to shape the future in their own interests.  Why shouldn’t Christians be doing something similar?

This sounds like just another bandwagon with the Christian church catching up with our secular society.  But it isn’t a matter of Christians catching up with the world, but rather of the world catching up with Christians.

Jesus had a vision statement concerning the coming of the Kingdom of God.   “Repent for the Kingdom of God is at hand”, (Matt. 4:17) was his motto.  We know that he wasn’t talking about territory but about his kingship expanding in the world one life at a time.  He used a few concise words to convey the heart of what he was doing.

In addition to the vision statement he had a mission statement.  He didn’t only know where he wanted to go, but he also knew the means by which he was going to get there.  In Luke 4:18-19, Jesus tells us of his mission to the poor, the prisoners, the blind and the oppressed and how he has come to declare to them the year of Lord’s favour.

This vision and this mission was not the result of a meaningless disjointed leap from Old Testament to New Testament.  It was a continuation and fulfilment of what had already been begun.  Jesus’ ministry was no grasshopper ministry jumping excitedly from one thing to another at the mercy of enthusiasms and pressures from dissidents.  This was a divine and eternal vision, reaching out to rescue mankind and bring them home.  It has been at heart of all the Lord has done from foundation of the world through the ministries of the prophets, priests and leaders, through the work of Bethlehem, Calvary and  Pentecost.  Our vision and mission statements must stand at centre of that flood of thinking and expression of the heart of God.

If we feel resistant to the idea of having vision statements we need to remember that we already have one.  It may not be on paper in statements of intent or plans, special activities, or strategies and publications but it is already there in our hearts and dictates the way that we live our lives, and the way that we pray, and the way that we plan for the future.

Many dioceses in the Church in Wales have a strategy.  It can be summed up in one word.  ‘Retreat’.  The current wisdom of the church is that we need to pull back to strong centres and consolidate what remains.  We have a ‘Custer’s-last-stand’ mentality.  The intention is that we will pass the flag from one dying member to the next and in that way we will keep the doors open for as long as possible. 

But we make a great mistake if that is to be our vision for the future.  I listened some years ago to the Chair of the Green Party being interviewed on the radio.  At one stage the party was poised for major political advance.  She was asked why things had gone wrong, and her answer was ‘We didn’t plan to succeed’.  In the early days of the last century the Methodist Forward Movement in South Wales adopted the policy of consolidation after decades of enormous advance under the leadership of courageous pioneers.  The result?  They had passed their peak and never regained the initiative in the evangelistic task of winning the nation to Christ. 

George Barna from the US comments that ‘encouraging people to pledge themselves to survival is an admission of defeat.  Calling people to hold the line  is not a mission statement but a death warrant’.  Margaret Thatcher said something similar, that ‘retreat as a tactic may sometimes be necessary, but as a settled policy it eats at the soul’.

Another vision statement of the Church in Wales is that we must  re-organise.  It sounds like a good suggestion because it gives an air of movement whilst we stand still.  Cardinal Newman described the church as an equestrian statue poised to leap forward, but when you came back years later it was still in the same position.  The Roman centurion Gaius Petronius has a devastating comment which ought to put paid to all suggestions of re-organisation.  He said, ‘We trained hard but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be re-organised.  I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by re-organising, and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency and demoralisation’.

So if we are not to retreat and we are not to re-organise what are we to be doing, where should we be going?  Anywhere so long as it is forward!

Let the leaders lead.  God never gave a vision to a committee in the Bible.  Usually he gave it to individuals and left them to cast that vision for others to follow.  So it is no good putting it as item 8 on the PCC agenda.  Vision is not the result of consensus, it should result in consensus, and it will come initially from the leaders of the church.  Leaders are God’s gift to church and are meant to lead.  The Bible has got a high view of leadership.  “Obey your leaders and submit to their authority”. (Heb 13:17)   It is a shame that many Christian leaders haven’t got a high view of themselves.  It has nothing to do with how gifted they are, but how Lord sees them.  He has invested them with authority.

Let’s take risks.  This is surely the nature of faith.  We believe that we have heard from God, then let’s follow that leading all the way, even if the ride is a bit bumpy from time to time.  There will always be blockers of any new initiative.  That is guaranteed.  We can’t expect 100% support.  There’s going to be friction.  Some years ago a human response to innovation was identified which is described as a  Natural Distribution Curve.  Every time a new idea is suggested then there will be 16% ready, 17% positive, 34% open, 17% negative, 16% resistant.  When the early church which couldn’t have been more vibrant and on-fire if it tried was faced with the choice of either building a solely Jewish church or of offering the Gospel to Gentiles there was friction.  Some went with it immediately whilst others dragged their heels.  The church didn’t have a world vision but God did.  So through spiritually hungry non-Jews, a vision from God, and a persuadable disciple the Christian faith reached the Gentiles, and us.

Vision will always create tension, conflict, friction, debate, and opposition.  ‘But’ says George Barna again, ‘remaining stationary is tantamount to losing ground.  Without risk no progress can be made’.  We cannot afford to stay where we are or we’ll lose the ground we already possess as well as fail to win the land we should be taking.

Return to Issue 31